SCORM vs xAPI are two popular tools that businesses use for various purposes. In this article, we’ll compare SCORM vs xAPI to help you decide which one is right for your needs.
Table of Contents
Overview
Let’s start with a brief overview of both SCORM and xAPI.
SCORM
SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) is the established industry standard for e-learning content focusing primarily on tracking activities within a learning management system. Its wide adoption ensures compatibility with virtually all LMS platforms making it the safe choice for traditional course-based learning.
xAPI
xAPI (Experience API formerly Tin Can API) extends beyond traditional LMS boundaries to track learning experiences across multiple platforms and activities. Its flexibility allows for tracking informal learning mobile experiences simulations and real-world performance providing more comprehensive learner data.
Ratings Comparison
| Platform | SCORM | xAPI |
|---|---|---|
| G2 Product Rating | ||
| Capterra Customer Service | ||
| Capterra Ease of Use | ||
| Capterra Functionality |
SCORM – Features & Capabilities
SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) is a set of technical standards for e-learning software products. Key features include interoperability, allowing content to work across different LMS platforms; reusability, enabling content to be reused in various courses; accessibility, ensuring content is easily accessible; tracking, which supports detailed progress and performance tracking; and sequencing, allowing for customized learning paths. SCORM ensures a consistent and efficient e-learning experience.
xAPI – Features & Capabilities
xAPI (Experience API), also known as Tin Can API, is a specification for tracking and recording learning experiences across various platforms and environments. Key features include the ability to track a wide range of activities (online, offline, real-world), support for rich metadata, interoperability across systems, and the use of “statements” to record learning experiences in a structured format. It enables detailed analytics, personalized learning paths, and integration with diverse learning tools, making it highly flexible and scalable for modern e-learning needs.
Pricing Comparison
Let’s compare the pricing plans for both SCORM and xAPI.
| Product | Pricing Plans |
|---|---|
| SCORM | Open standard, no fixed pricing |
| xAPI | Open standard, no fixed pricing |
Conclusion
SCORM and xAPI are both eLearning standards, but they differ significantly in their capabilities and use cases. SCORM is a well-established standard that ensures content interoperability across LMS platforms, making it ideal for traditional eLearning courses focused on tracking completion, scores, and time spent within an LMS. It is widely supported and sufficient for straightforward training programs like onboarding or compliance modules. However, SCORM’s limitations include its inability to track learning outside the LMS or capture detailed learner interactions.
xAPI (Experience API), on the other hand, is a more modern and versatile standard designed to track learning experiences across multiple contexts, both online and offline. It collects granular data on learner interactions, including mobile learning, simulations, real-world activities, and even VR/AR experiences. xAPI stores this data in a Learning Record Store (LRS), enabling richer insights into learner behavior and performance. While xAPI offers greater flexibility and advanced tracking capabilities, it requires more technical setup and is less universally supported than SCORM.
Ultimately, SCORM is better suited for simple, LMS-based eLearning programs, while xAPI is ideal for organizations seeking to track diverse learning experiences and gain deeper insights into learner behavior. The choice depends on the complexity of the training needs and the level of data analysis required.
